Re: [Gems-users] simics "continue" vs opal sim-step


Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:12:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: Luke Yen <lyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] simics "continue" vs opal sim-step
> After a simulation has been interrupted by a MAGIC_BREAKPOINT, is it
> the same typing "c X" and typing "opal0.sim-step X" from simics
> command line (where X is an integer number of instructions to be
> executed) or do the two commands have different effects?
>

   No. "c X" is stepping Simics only, with no effect on the Opal or Ruby
timing modules.  With Opal and Ruby loaded together, it is Opal's job to
step Simics, through the sim-continue() Sim continue interface.  In order
to collect timing information from Opal and Ruby use "opal0.sim-step X"
instead.

   Luke
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]