Date: | Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:05:13 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | Lei Jin <jinlei@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] MOESI_SMP_directory protocol |
Hi,It seems MOESI_SMP_directory protocol is non-inclusive between L1 and L2. Am I right? If I want to model a tile-based CMP with private L1 and shared L2, which protocol is the best starting point? Lei |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] ruby cycles and actions, Mike Marty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] MOESI_SMP_directory protocol, Mike Marty |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] modules, Dan Gibson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] MOESI_SMP_directory protocol, Mike Marty |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |