Your assertion should only occur if the DATA_BLOCK parameter, in 
$GEMS/ruby/config/rubyconfig.defaults is set to "true", or you are using 
the LogTM protocol.
 We will fix this assertion in a minor update to the release in the near 
future.  For now, you can comment out the assertion statement, 
recompile, and it shouldn't cause any ill effects. 
--Mike
Shachar Gang wrote:
 
I am not familiar with that parameter.
What does it do and how can I set it?
Shachar
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:29:47 -0600, Mike Marty wrote
   
Are you setting the DATA_BLOCK configuration parameter to true in Ruby?
--Mike
Shachar Gang wrote:
     
Hi,
I am using GEMS 1.2 with simics 2.2.12
 After compiling Ruby (based on QuickStart guide) I tried to run my 
      
 
 
simulation,
   
But I got the following:
failed assertion 'address < 0x100000000ull' at fn integer_t
SIMICS_read_physical_memory(int, physical_address_t, int) in
simics/interface.C:237
failed assertion 'address < 0x100000000ull' at fn integer_t
SIMICS_read_physical_memory(int, physical_address_t, int) in
simics/interface.C:237
 At this point you might want to attach a debug to the running and get to 
      
 
 
the
   
crash site; otherwise press enter to continue
PID: 10568
Can anyone can help me?
Thanks,
Shachar Gang
Tel-Aviv University
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
       
 
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
 at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
     
 
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
   
 
 
 |