| Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:23:14 -0600 (CST) | 
|---|---|
| From: | Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] regarding MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory protocol | 
Sorry, we haven't fixed any bugs in MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory protocol since the release. Please let us know what you find or if you have further questions. Make sure you use the PROTOCOL_DEBUG_TRACE to debug the protocol. There is a short blurb on using this in the GEMS online documentation wiki. --Mike > Hi > I have been using the MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory protocol and I am > getting deadlock assertions while running 16 & 32 processors with 2 > processors per chip ( especially while running the LU benchmark). I am > using gems version 1.1. Did you guys fix bugs in this protocol after > this release ? Can anyone provide me with a better version of this > protocol ? > Otherwise I will have to debug it myself . > thanks > salil > _______________________________________________ > Gems-users mailing list > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users >  | 
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] regarding MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory protocol, Salil... | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Compiling Ruby, Yasuko Watanabe | 
| Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] regarding MSI_MOSI_CMP_directory protocol, Salil... | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Ruby x86 Patch, Version 0.4 BETA Released, shan | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |