Re: [Gems-users] Ruby_cycles != opal0.cycle ?!

[Weihang Jiang <weihang.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>]

Min:
Yes, it has been set to 2. What is the exact use of "multiplier"? When
should it be used?
 
Thanks


On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:06:19 -0600, Min Xu (Hsu) <xu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Weihang,
> 
> I notice the opal cycle is exactly twice of the ruby cycle.
> I think the difference came from the ruby/opal multiplier.
> Did you set the multiplier to 2?
> 
> -Min
> 
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 Weihang Jiang wrote :
> > Hi,
> >     opal0.cycle tells me that "The current cycle is: 228737428". But
> > ruby0.dump-stats tells
> > me that "Ruby_cycles: 114368714". Why?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Weihang Jiang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gems-users mailing list
> > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> 


-- 
Weihang Jiang