Re: [Gems-users] running barnes-hut


Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:52:37 -0400
From: yilmazer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] running barnes-hut
Thank you Luke.
But I wonder why it results in operating system synch on target system.

Thanks again.
ayse.
Quoting Luke Yen <lyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi:
> 
>   I have noticed alot of "patches" also on our version of the barnes
> workload.  However I don't recall seeing the decodeFails messages.  This
> is displayed whenever Opal cannot properly decode an instruction.  The
> best way to debug this is to go through the code in Opal where instructions
> are
> decoded (opal/system/static.C, in the decodeInstructionInfo() function),
> and track down which switch statements are causing the failures.
> >From your output this seems to be isolated to a single instruction.
> 
>   FYI decodeFail() gets called whenever the FAIL macro gets invoked inside
> decodeInstructionInfo().
> 
> 
>   Hope this helps,
>    Luke
> 
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 yilmazer@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > When I was running splash benchmarks(fft,lu) first I got the warning
> messages
> > below and after that operating system began to sync. What can be the
> problem?
> >
> >
> >
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > ### statici::decodeFails. line:877. inst=0x737472
> >  0000 0000 0111 0011:0111 0100 0111 0010
> > patch  NPC: 0xffffffffff3b3840 0xff3b3840
> > patch  NPC: 0xffffffffff3b3840 0xff3b3840
> > patch  NPC: 0xffffffffff3b3840 0xff3b3840
> > patch  NPC: 0xffffffffff3b3840 0xff3b3840
> > patch  PC: 0xff104fe8 0x1000400
> > patch  NPC: 0xff104fec 0x1000404
> > patch  PC: 0x1000480 0x1000820
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000484 0x1000824
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> > patch  PC: 0x1000d00 0xf000d294
> > patch  NPC: 0x1000d04 0xf000d298
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Quoting Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > > This looks like an operating system issue. Make sure you have enough
> locks
> > > > available specified in your OS. Different systems have different
> parameters
> > > to
> > > > set, usually in /etc/system, but you might want to check with your OS
> > > reference
> > > > manual.
> > > >
> > >
> > > And be sure that it works without Ruby/Opal loaded.
> > >
> > > --Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gems-users mailing list
> > > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gems-users mailing list
> > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> 



[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]