Re: [Gems-users] Unknown SPARC Instructions in OPAL

[Weihang Jiang <weihang.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>]

No. Also, I redo the experiment and see that the number of unknown
instructions is small. As Nauman mentioned, I also believe the results
have not be effected too much.

On 4/11/05, Nauman Rafique <nrafique@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am getting the same message, while running apache. Opal does not stop. I am
> assuming that the simulation results would not be effected too much, as the
> state is kept in sync with simics?
> 
> --
> Nauman
> 
> 
> Quoting Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Weihang,
> >
> > Does this cause Opal to stop?
> >
> > --Mike
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >     I am runing DB2 on SIMICS/GEMS. Opal printed out :###
> > > statici::decodeFails. line:3274. inst=0xff2c07a8
> > >
> > > 1111 1111 0010 1100:0000 0111 1010 1000
> > >
> > >    As SPARC V9 manual says, rd (bit 29 to 25) should be 0 or 1. (So
> > > does opal think) I am not sure why here rd is "11111", which is
> > > reserved.
> > >
> > >    Since you have run DB2 before, maybe you have some idea.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Weihang Jiang
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gems-users mailing list
> > > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gems-users mailing list
> > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> 


-- 
Weihang Jiang