Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:11:37 -0400 |
---|---|
From: | Buddhika Chamith Kahawitage Don <budkahaw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Static binary rewriting |
I see. Thanks On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Bill Williams <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: You'll see the same code layout either way: inline instrumentation with respect to a relocated function that's reached via interception branches. |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] dyninst lock_tramp_guard, Bill Williams |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] dyninst lock_tramp_guard, Marc |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Static binary rewriting, Bill Williams |
Next by Thread: | [DynInst_API:] Status of Dyninst 10, GermÃn Llort |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |