Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:44:47 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Xiaozhu Meng <mxz297@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Question on potential memory leaks |
Hi Thomas, I had some memory issues related to ROSE in Dyninst, but they were not about memory leaks. My experiences are that ROSE internally has their own memory management system, including their customized small object allocation, deallocation, and their own implementation for shared pointers. ROSE typically free objects created by ROSE at the very end of the program, specifically, after returning from main and in global destruction time.ÂÂ I have little experience with LeakSanitizer, but my question is does LeakSanitizer consider code after returning from Main? Thanks, --Xiaozhu On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Dullien <thomasdullien@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Question on potential memory leaks, Thomas Dullien |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Question on potential memory leaks, Thomas Dullien |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Question on potential memory leaks, Thomas Dullien |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Question on potential memory leaks, Thomas Dullien |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |