Ok, fair enough. Let me know how much effort it takes to support
both.
As you know, we build our own. It's been on my mental to-do list (for
over a year now) to switch to elfutils, but there have always been more
pressing crises. I'll use this to upgrade the priority, especially
since it's something I've been meaning to do for a long time.
But I do suggest that you try to support both, if that's not too much
trouble. There are probably a lot of other systems that still use
libelf. But that's just a suggestion.
And of course, you'll want to clearly document this in the build
instructions.
Thanks,
--Mark
On 11/08/16 11:10, Bill Williams wrote:
Mark--
This does appear to be a libelf version issue; the code that's changed here was part of getting cross-platform/cross-endian analysis working better. I'll take a look and see whether it's possible to get libelf.so.0 to behave nicely and provide the features we need here, but in the interim the elfutils version of the library should work fine.
--bw
|
![[Computer Systems Lab]](http://www.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}