On 07/31/2015 03:12 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 08:54 AM, Bill Williams wrote:
>> On 07/30/2015 05:28 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
>>> These syscalls can read/write entire blocks of memory in one syscall,
>>> rather than using a series of word-sized ptrace peek/poke requests.
>>>
>>> However, not all kernels have these (ENOSYS), and they don't bypass page
>>> protection (EFAULT), so the ptrace way is still required as a fallback.
>>> ---
>> Do you need a Debian/Ubuntu cross-check on these?
>
> I have a few Debian VMs I can try, if that's what you're asking. I
> believe it's written generically enough to cover all bases, at worst
> just using the old behavior. But I'll make sure before pushing.
Well, I'm getting strange cmake errors on my Debian VMs, and don't have
more time to mess with it now. So yeah, if you can double check it,
that would be nice, thanks!
|
![[Computer Systems Lab]](http://www.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}