Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:15:06 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | Barton Miller <bart@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Dyninst with Intel compilers on Linux/x86_64 |
Is there a reason that you're not building Dyninst with the default
(gcc) compilers?
You can still instrument binaries from any other compiler. --bart On 02/04/2015 03:48 AM, Mark Dixon wrote: On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Bill Williams wrote: ...We only have official support for building with gcc (*nix) and MSVC (Windows). It looks to me like we've fallen down an "if not GNU" rabbit hole here and attempted to build with (non-existent) MSVC.... Hi Bill, Thanks for that:- sorry, I hadn't realised. I think I must have misunderstood the requirements of the rest of the toolchain - I'll take a closer look. If I need to do this and edit the cmake files, I'll share the results. All the best, Mark |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Hung process, Gerard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Dyninst with Intel compilers on Linux/x86_64, Mark Dixon |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Dyninst with Intel compilers on Linux/x86_64, Mark Dixon |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Dyninst with Intel compilers on Linux/x86_64, Mark Dixon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |