Date: | Thu, 23 May 2013 13:50:02 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Bill Williams <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Proposal: Add System Call Events to ProcControlAPI |
Addendum to my last, re: MachSyscall vs. EventSyscall at the BPatch level:MachSyscalls are intended to be cross-component; EventSyscalls tie things pretty tightly to ProcControl. Unless there’s a good reason to keep things as events, I think I’d prefer to break open the EventSyscall and present the BPatch users with MachSyscalls plus some extra data. --bw |
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Proposal: Add System Call Events to ProcControlAPI, Bill Williams |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Proposal: Add System Call Events to ProcControlAPI, Emily Jacobson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Proposal: Add System Call Events to ProcControlAPI, David Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Proposal: Add System Call Events to ProcControlAPI, Emily Jacobson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |